Insta360 Antigravity A1 vs DJI: Can 360° Drones Beat FPV?

Insta360's first drone challenges DJI Avata with 8K 360° capture. A deep dive into how the Antigravity A1 stacks up against DJI's FPV dominance.

Editorial Team •

The Drone War Gets a 360° Twist

Here's something I never thought I'd see: Insta360, the company that's been crushing it in the 360-camera space, is taking on DJI in the drone market. And they're not trying to out-DJI DJI by making a better traditional drone. No, they're doing what they do best—bringing 360-degree capture to the skies with the Antigravity A1.

As someone who's been following both companies for years, this is fascinating. DJI owns the drone market with an iron grip. Their Avata series has defined the FPV (first-person view) drone experience. But Insta360 isn't playing that game. They're playing their own game, and honestly? I'm here for it.

Let me walk you through what makes this matchup so interesting, and whether Insta360's 360-degree gambit can actually compete with DJI's refined FPV formula.

The History: Insta360's Unfinished Business

Before we dive into the Antigravity A1, let's talk about Insta360's drone history. This isn't their first rodeo. Several years ago, they tried entering the drone market with accessories that mounted 360 cameras onto existing drones. The idea was solid: leverage their camera expertise without building a whole drone from scratch.

It didn't work out. The execution was clunky, the market wasn't ready, and DJI's ecosystem was already too strong. Insta360 quietly backed away.

But here's the thing about good ideas—they don't die, they evolve. Fast forward to 2025, and Insta360 is back with a fully integrated solution. The Antigravity A1 isn't a camera strapped to someone else's drone. It's their vision, built from the ground up. This is their redemption story, and they're swinging for the fences.

The Fundamental Difference: 360° vs. Traditional FPV

Here's where things get interesting. The Antigravity A1 and DJI's Avata series are both designed for immersive flying experiences, but they approach it from completely different angles.

DJI Avata (and Avata 2): You wear FPV goggles and see what the drone's front camera sees—a traditional, high-quality video feed. It's like you're sitting in the cockpit. The experience is incredibly immersive, the footage is stunning, and you're flying where the camera points. Simple, intuitive, effective.

Insta360 Antigravity A1: You wear Vision goggles and see... everything. The A1 captures 8K 360-degree footage with dual fisheye lenses mounted on the top and bottom of the drone. During flight, you can look around in any direction—up, down, behind, anywhere—independent of where the drone is actually flying. In post-production, you can reframe the footage to extract the perfect shot.

It's "shoot first, frame later" philosophy applied to aerial cinematography. And that's either genius or overcomplicating things, depending on your perspective.

The Avata Killer? Let's Be Honest

Okay, confession time. As much as I love Insta360's innovation, calling the A1 an "Avata killer" is premature. Here's why.

What the A1 Does Better:

  1. Total Creative Freedom: With 360° capture, you literally cannot miss a shot. Fly through a forest, and in post you can choose to look at the trees whipping by, the sky above, or even backward at where you came from. That's powerful.

  2. Invisible Drone Effect: Insta360's stitching technology makes the drone disappear from the footage. You get pure, unobstructed spherical video. It's genuinely impressive and creates unique perspectives that traditional drones can't achieve.

  3. Weight Class Advantage: At exactly 249 grams, the A1 sits just under the 250g regulatory threshold. In Europe and other regions, this means fewer restrictions, no license requirements, and easier compliance. The DJI Avata 2 weighs 377g—not a huge deal in many places, but in strict regulatory environments, that 128g difference matters.

  4. Beginner-Friendly Flight: The Grip controller and motion controls are designed to be intuitive. You're not learning complex stick controls; you're just... pointing and moving. For newcomers, this lowers the barrier to entry significantly.

What DJI Still Does Better:

This is where my DJI bias gets tested, and honestly, DJI still has some serious advantages.

  1. Image Quality: Here's the brutal truth about 360 cameras—they split their sensor real estate across the entire sphere. The Antigravity A1 shoots 8K 360°, which sounds impressive until you realize that when you extract a traditional 16:9 frame from that sphere, you're working with maybe 4K equivalent resolution, maybe less depending on the angle. The DJI Avata 2 shoots native 4K/60fps or 2.7K/120fps with a traditional sensor optimized for forward-facing capture. For pure image quality in your final output, DJI has the edge.

  2. Real-Time Experience: Flying the Avata with DJI Goggles 3 is visceral. You're in the moment, seeing exactly what you're capturing, making split-second creative decisions. The A1's 360° feed is cool, but you're essentially flying blind to what your final composition will be. You're deferring creative decisions to post-production.

  3. Ecosystem and Reliability: DJI has been making drones for over a decade. Their flight controllers are mature, their obstacle avoidance systems are refined, and their ecosystem (batteries, accessories, software) is battle-tested. Insta360 is entering this space fresh. That brings innovation, but also uncertainty.

  4. Battery Life and Flight Performance: This is where I need more data. DJI's Avata 2 offers up to 23 minutes of flight time with the standard battery. For the A1 to be competitive at 249g, I'm skeptical it'll match that. If Insta360 can deliver 20+ minutes, I'll be impressed. But if it's stuck at 15 minutes or less, that's a significant limitation for real-world shooting.

The Performance Metrics That Matter

Let's talk about the specs that actually affect whether this drone is usable or just a cool gimmick.

Wind Resistance: For any drone, especially lightweight ones, wind resistance is critical. DJI's consumer drones typically handle level 5 wind conditions (29-38 km/h). That's not extreme, but it's enough for most shooting scenarios. If the Antigravity A1 can't match this, it'll be frustratingly grounded on breezy days. I haven't seen official wind resistance specs yet, and that worries me.

Battery Life: I mentioned this earlier, but it bears repeating. A 30-minute flight time sounds good on paper, but in practice, you're spending time taking off, positioning, and landing. Your actual recording window is maybe 20 minutes. If the A1 delivers less than 20 minutes total flight time, it'll feel limiting. You'll be constantly swapping batteries and interrupting your creative flow.

Heat Management: Here's where Insta360's camera experience could be a double-edged sword. 360 cameras process a ton of data—dual 4K+ streams stitched in real-time. That generates heat. Will the A1 suffer from thermal throttling like some of their action cameras have in the past? Or have they engineered around it? Time will tell.

The Software Wildcard: Where Insta360 Could Win

Here's where things get exciting. Insta360's software ecosystem is legitimately best-in-class. Their mobile app and Insta360 Studio desktop software are intuitive, powerful, and constantly updated with creative features. They understand post-production workflow for 360 content better than anyone.

The question is: can they apply that expertise to drone footage in a way that makes the 360° approach better than traditional filming?

I'm imagining features like:

If Insta360 delivers on this kind of software innovation, the A1 becomes more than a novelty. It becomes a legitimate creative tool that does things DJI drones simply can't.

But—and this is a big but—if the software is clunky, if the reframing workflow is tedious, if it takes 30 minutes to edit what would've been a 5-minute traditional edit, then the 360° advantage evaporates. It becomes a party trick, not a professional tool.

My Take: Welcome Competition, Uncertain Victory

Here's my honest assessment as someone who wants both companies to succeed (but has a soft spot for DJI).

I'm thrilled Insta360 is doing this. The drone market needs competition. DJI has been so dominant for so long that innovation has slowed. The Antigravity A1 forces DJI to think differently, and that benefits everyone. We're already seeing leaks about DJI working on their own 360 drone, likely an Avata 360. That wouldn't be happening without Insta360's push.

But I'm skeptical about mass appeal. The 360-degree workflow is undeniably powerful for specific use cases—extreme sports POV, creative storytelling, experimental filmmaking. But for most people who want a fun FPV drone to capture cool footage? The traditional DJI Avata approach is simpler, more intuitive, and delivers better out-of-the-box image quality.

The real test will be execution. Can Insta360 deliver on the fundamentals? Not the flashy 360 features, but the boring stuff: battery life, wind resistance, reliable flight controls, consistent performance. If they nail those, the A1 will find its audience. If they fumble them, it'll be another cool idea that didn't quite land.

As of now, the Antigravity A1 is slated for release in January 2026. I'll be watching closely. I want Insta360 to succeed. I want them to prove that there's room for innovation in the drone space. But they're stepping into DJI's house, and DJI doesn't lose at home very often.

Choose the Insta360 Antigravity A1 if:

Stick with DJI Avata (or wait for Avata 3) if:

The drone wars just got more interesting. Let's see if Insta360's 360-degree bet pays off, or if DJI's traditional approach keeps them on top. Either way, we win.

← Back to Blog